Save Fuel

 Home  

"The following is a quick list of the improvements I noticed on the first time on the water with the Tiger Shark:

1. Hole-shot improved - took only 2000 rpm's to reach plane compared to 3000 rpm's before installation of the Tiger Shark.
2. Engine noice was reduced - it seemed to deflect noise from the thru-hub exhaust.
3. Ride was smoother - with the engine trimmed down in rough water the side to side motion was reduced when crossing waves or wakes from other boats.

"Needless to say I am very impresed with the improved performance of my boat.  I will recommedn it to the other boaters I speak to."

Jim Brack
Fremont, CA

 

"I have been well pleased with the performance of my Tiger Shark on my 245 Four Winds.

"Fuel usage before the Tiger Shark was installed was between 12 and 15 gallons per hour at a  cruising rate of 3000 rpm, depending on the number of persons on board.

"After the installation I actually thought my fuel gauge had broken. When we checked the fuel consumption after a whole weekend of various activities including water skiing, high-speed runs, cruising, etc., we had burned an average of 6 gallons per hour.

"Since then we have continued in the 4 to 6 gallons per hour range, and I am extremely pleased with the performance of the Tiger Shark."

Tim Bryant
Mountain Home, NC